Back to www.edisclosure.uk.com

     Commercial Ct   Chancery   TCC   QBD   Mercantile   County Ct   Total
  Q1. Roughly how many cases have you been involved in where there has been a CMC since the new Rules for disclosure came into effect (16 April 2013)?    10    10    6    3    0    0    29
  Q2. In roughly how many of those cases did the court order that there should be no disclosure?    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
  Q3. In roughly how many of those cases did the court order that a party disclose the documents on which it relies, and at the same time request any specific disclosure it requires from any other party?    1 (10%)    3 (30%)    1 (16%)    0    0    0    5 (17%)
  Q4. In roughly how many of those cases did the court order disclosure to be given by each party on an issue by issue basis?    1 (10%)    0    1 (16%)    0    0    0    2 (6%)
  Q5. In roughly how many cases did the court order that each party disclose any documents which it is reasonable to suppose may contain information which enables that party to advance its own case or to damage that of any other party, or which leads to an enquiry which has either of those consequences?    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
  Q6. In roughly how many of those cases did the court order that a party give standard disclosure?    8 (80%)    7 (70%)    3 (50%)    3 (100%)    0    0    21 (72%)
  Q7. In roughly how many of those cases did the court make some other order in relation to disclosure which the court considered appropriate?    0    1 (10%)    0    0    0    0    1 (3%)
  Q8. In roughly how many of those cases did the court order that no disclosure report was required?    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
  Q9. In roughly how many of those cases was no order for disclosure made at the first CMC because one or more parties were insufficiently prepared for directions to be given in relation to disclosure?    0    0    1 (16%)    0    0    0    1 (3%)
  Q10. In roughly how many of those cases did the parties record their agreement in relation to disclosure in a joint document?    5 (50%)    3 (30%)    5 (83%)    1 (33%)    0    0    14 (48%)
  Q11. In roughly how many of those cases did the parties use the TeCSA eDisclosure Protocol (http://www.tecsa.org.uk/e-disclosure) as the starting-point for a joint document?    0    1 (10%)    3 (50%)    0    0    0    4 (13%)
  Q12. In roughly how many of those cases did one or more parties use or plan to use predictive coding or technology assisted review (as opposed to keyword searches without predictive coding or TAR)?    0    0    1 (16%)    0    0    0    1 (3%)
  Q13. In roughly how many cases in which a costs budget was NOT mandatory did the court order that costs budgets should be filed and exchanged?    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
  Q14. In roughly how many cases in which a costs budget was mandatory did the court order that no costs budgets be filed and exchanged?    0    0    3 (50%)    3 (100%)    0    0    6 (20%)

Summary of responses as at 08/04/2014 12:24:16 Back to www.edisclosure.uk.com